Allies abandon Obama’s ship
Will Congress “Rubber stamp”,
To further Zion wicked script?
| Syria: a vote of no-confidence in
the President |
Syria: a vote of no-confidence in
the President
by Jon Rappoport
September 7, 2013
www.nomorefakenews.com
As members of Congress reveal that
calls to their offices are overwhelmingly against the war, and the House
considers it may not vote at all, in order to spare Obama embarrassment, we
can see a version of what refusing to vote for a president on election day
looks like.
It looks like: no-confidence.
Every four years, I write about
this possibility. Suppose only 19% of eligible voters showed up at the polls.
It would speak loudly: The American people no longer trust the major
candidates. They no longer trust the charade. They no longer trust the
vote-count. They know both major candidates work for the same Globalist
machine.
No-confidence.
Well, here it is. On the issue of
the war.
I'm not saying the Congress will
reject war. They may go ahead and drive the steamroller over the people. But
it's getting a little hairy for them.
And remember this. The media play
any significant presidential victory as a signal that all his programs and
plans are getting a boost. But on the flip side, that means a significant
failure, in full view of the country, will register---despite the hype and
explanations---as a weakening of his overall standing.
Washington DC registers such
shifts in power like starving dogs smelling bloody meat. They attack.
War is supposed to be such a big
deal that it's a foregone conclusion, if the President wants it. He either
sends the planes on his own, or Congress rubber stamps his position first.
But this time, it's different.
This time it's: do we believe the
President and his "evidence" and his claim that he's taking the
moral high ground; or don't we. The question is in plain sight. It's out
there for all to see.
The push to war is such an obvious
fabrication, only a complete fool or a dyed-in-the-wool Obama believer would
opt for attacking Syria. The hypnotic Obama bubble is bursting, even for many
of the faith.
In my last article on Syria, I
pointed out that the super-secret Congressional intell briefing was a sham.
It was all generality and no hard evidence. It was basically arm twisting.
So what's left? Nothing. "Do
what the President wants you to do."
If Congress says yes, they'll go
down deeper into the dumper with Obama. These barnacles on the body politic
can do one thing: assess self-interest and electability. They're thinking
about it.
They're in the pressure cooker.
Taking a step back...do you think
Obama woke up one day and said, "Hold on here. Assad just used chemical
weapons on his own people. I have to take action. I have to punish him."
Of course not. This idea came from
somewhere else. It's been on the table for years, as part of a Middle East
strategy to destabilize the whole region. It's, on one level, a Mossad-CIA
plan, with a Saudi twist. On a higher level, it's a Globalist operation,
whose end game is order from chaos.
Partition nations into warring
ethnic enclaves, disrupt the oil flow, create, therefore, planet-wide
depression, and come in behind that to install new fascist dictator-puppets,
bringing in international banksters to "re-finance" the whole region
and own it from the ground up.
Obama is just another renter in
the White House, playing the cards he was dealt. He goes along with the show,
introducing his own prejudices, like any other President, and takes what he
can get.
He's no magic man, and now his
juice is running out.
A no-confidence vote against war
on Syria could, however, expand to mean no-confidence in any White House
occupant from the two major parties.
Waking up is hard to do, but if
the American people keep their eyes open, they'll see that this Syria
escapade is just one more example of an agenda that betrays any sane person's
idea of what America is supposed to be.
The only kind of transcendent
President, in these times, would be one who, after a year or so in office,
would hold a press conference and say, "I've learned I'm being run. Men
are controlling the office of President. I'm supposed to take their orders.
Here is what I know about them. Here are their names. Here is what they told
me. Here is how they're trying to coerce me. This is the story, the real
story about what has happened to this country..."
To which people might say,
"How could a President do that? They'd kill him."
Exactly. That's why I used the
word "transcendent."
Every American President sends
soldiers to their deaths, and he kills people in distant countries. To be
"transcendent" is to put his own life on the line, too.
That should give you some idea
about why no-votes signaling no confidence in Presidents are vital. None of
them will go as far as necessary to blow the cover on who really runs this
nation.
Jon Rappoport
|
